Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free
Product DescriptionEXPLODING myths about MONEY Our money is not what we have been led to believe. The creation of money has been “privatized”, or taken over by a private money cartel. Except for coins, all our money is now created as loans advanced by private banks – including the private Federal Reserve. Banks create the principal but no interest to service their loans. To find the interest, new loans must continually be taken out, expanding the money supply, inflating prices – and robbing you of the value of your money. Web of Debt unravels the deception and presents a crystal clear picture of the financial abyss towards which we are going. After exploring a viable option, which one was tested in Colonial America and is grounded in the best American economic thought, including the writings of Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. If you care about economic security, your own or the nation, you should rea. . . Read more>>
Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System and How We Can Break Free
Thursday, 24. June 2010 4:49
After notice many historical inaccuracies that have been made by the author early in the book, I became suspicious. Her agenda seemed to be: Fiat money (aid from nothing) is good, as long as the government issues it. Money is backed by something real bad. Interest charged by private banks is bad, but interest rate, which governments are bra.Så I turned on the back of the book to learn a little more about the author. This taught economics turns out to be a female lawyer from Los Angeles (La La Land). At that time the book went in the garbage. Do not miss this. Rating: 1 / 5
Thursday, 24. June 2010 5:54
Without a doubt, this is the worst book I ever read. If you are a conspiracy nut, and believe that the Jewish bankers rule the world, or that David Rockefeller sits at home giving orders to every Western government by the Trilateral Commission, then this book for dig.Författaren, who apparently graduated from writing books about ” natural “cures for arthritis and cancer, knows nothing about basic economics. More importantly, she has done very legitimate research and, when she tries to make an important point, she mentions either a source or stupid just to make a claim without stöd.Jag read this book as part of a book club (one of our members apparently had a bad recommendation). All nine agreed that it was terrible. One of our members wanted to bet that most could find fault in one minute. It was so illa.Här are some random notes I made while trying to get through this. In the intro on page xiii covers her a promise from Mr. Simpson, that she will be presenting credible evidence of a widespread conspiracy: “Credible evidence is presented in a global power elite’s intentions to have absolute control over the planet and its natural resources, including its humble Human Resources “or” human capital “.” Of course, she does such a thing, except to repeat vague Ranting of various conspiracy theories heard in years. On page 63 she notes that Nathan Rothschild controlled Bank of England after the 1820th How long? How? What support? On page 76, claims she was the constitutional convention voted to leave out the money from the Constitution. When was the vote? Where is the record of this vote? What language was proposed, but then was hit? On page 110, she suggests that President McKinley was assassinated by pro-British interests. But she admits that there could never be proved. But no serious scientist has ever found a shred of evidence linking killer of a British bank, company or other intressen.Vidare on the same page, she states that the Morgan and Rockefeller have been competing for power, “but the puppeteers pulling the strings has always been one of the two big-money players. ” Of course, elsewhere she says repeatedly that it was Rothscils and Warburg. Reading these flip-flops through the entire book, it felt like our company / spouse in the Manchurian Candidate who had to beg his wife for please choose a number for the number of Communist conspirators threaten Amerika.Åtta pages later, on page 118, “Although Rothschild was technically rivals in the Peabody / Morgan firm had a reputation that they had formed a secret alliance. ” Of course, JP Morgan was one of the most Viscious anti-Semites in America (Ms.. Brown, can you identify a single Jew ever employed by his company in his life, or any year thereafter?) But the author invites us to accept the “rumors” about a ” secret “alliance. Forgive the sarcasm, but I expect the next release will be asking us to accept the “alien landing in Roswell was with this in alliansen.På page 126,” A popular rumor says that the Federal Reserve is owned by a powerful clicks of foreign financiers, but this can not be proved from the public record. “Wait, I thought it was those Americans Morgan and Rockefeller. Of course the Federal Reserve is controlled by its board of directors, including the president, all appointed by the president. I wish Ms. Brown was able to provide us with the names on the foreign Jewish bankers who told our last presidential whom to appoint. I would also like to know who this rumor is so popular. Again, I suspect that the same people who think Elvis is alive and about to appear in Vegas.På page 131 , author states that “In formulating a constitution for their new utopia, founders left the federal income tax. They considered that the taxation of income, to the ultimate source of productivity, be economic madness. “Perhaps in the next release Ms. Brown should mention that a word at the convention where the notion of income tax was discussed and rejected. Constitutional researchers would love to see there are so det.Det many other gems, but I’m getting tired, so let me close by, one of my favorites. On page 203, she says, “While the puppeteers behind the Kennedy assassination has never publicly exposed, some scientists have concluded that he was another victim for the invisible hand of the international corporate / banking / military cooperation. “Well, that certainly narrows it down. The site she cites in support has apparently been discontinued. I wonder if the dang cartel in the igen.Om someone would actually care to read a lucid, well-reasoned book on the Fed, you can try “Secrets of the Temple” by Willaim Greider. Also, for a lot of work scholarship on the spot banking system and money is to promote a growing economy, see “The Ascent of Money ‘ by Niall Ferguson. But for you conspiracy types tend, unfortunately, not to make their key points with sentences that begin: “Rumor has it.” “Rating: 1 / 5
Thursday, 24. June 2010 6:46
This book is simply a collection of some of the oldest and worst financial houses combined together in what parades as a coherent theory of money. Most of the houses date back to Merchantalist era of 17’s. These houses seem to never disappear. It would require an entire book just to disclose all the bad that is said in this book. This has already been made indirectly through many economic thinkers in the last 250 years. Nothing is original in this bok.Författaren to this book, Ellen Brown, has developed her theories or analysis by, what I would term, research in reverse order. This means that she started from a set of desired conclusions and worked backwards to develop a theory to justify them. I make this accusation only because I do not think the author is smart enough to have been able to develop a more precise analysis and have reached quite different conclusions if she had started this project may impartially and without dagordning.Det is much that is wrong with our monetary system and the system of fractional reserve banking, but most of the analysis in this book is incorrect, at best, and most often then not, is simply false. The author does not understand Money, Credit, and Banking. She lay down in this book to learn the issue from the biggest economic story of the cranks. The few people in the value that she cites in his book, apparently have been ignored by her in terms of economic theory. This book is nothing but an attempt to justify the absurd political doctrines, by making them appear to be based on sound science and research. This book is that Keynesian theory on Steroids was written for the layman, but disguised as something annat.Boken makes the traditional false dichotomy often by Marxists of private and public, and of course it must be submitted at all, but a healthy economy to promote this illusion . This book is sometimes like a Michael Moore-story makes no distinction between pure capitalism and state capitalism or interventionism. The real dichotomy, as the book does not expectedly, is the voluntary trade in a free market versus government coercion, or simply free enterprise versus government control. After having “private” company does not make them without government control and special privileges that could not be obtained on the voluntary free market. Our banking system is, in fact, just that, a quasi-public system, a cartel of banks enforced by the government have created laws and institutions. How this book deal on the one hand, to highlight some real facts about how the Fed was created, but then still maintain that this is a “private” problem and that we need more government is simply beyond me. A government in control of the money is effectively what we already have, but she will want to convince you that this is not so. Why? Because her proposal doctrine, which is just another proposal for some variant of socialism, disguised as something else and of course “democracy”, requires that a central authority to print money so that it can direct the production. It could not work even if we all wanted to go with her socialist utopia. An airplane needs wings to fly and motor for traction. Her proposed models do not have both. Rating: 1 / 5
Thursday, 24. June 2010 8:57
I recommend this book for people who want to understand economics. This is such a confusing mishmash of ideas that it is difficult to start commenting. The author has no understanding of economics and money. Money is just a piece of paper to her and she suggests that we let the state take over the banking system to cure all our problems. She cobbles together a bunch of interconnected thoughts and events and will create some conspiracy theory with no basis in reality or theory. I wonder if she ever read a book on economics – even a bad en.Problemet is that anyone can write these kinds of things and people will read it thinking they have an idea of how the world works. This is conspiracy-theory nut-fringe-that kind of stuff. If the readers really want to learn something, try instead Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in one lesson. It is readable, logical and straight forward. It has been in publication for 50 + years and has sold one million copies. Start there and you will understand basic economics. Rating: 1 / 5
Thursday, 24. June 2010 10:22
Lots of information on the financial history of our country. Much of what I have read before and had to really search for something new or important information. Difficult to find information that I could use to help me avoid future pitfalls. Had hoped for something more useful to me as an investor. Did not find it. Rating: 4 / 5